Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1274

reference
647-tree-1
name
1274
tree-preservation-order

undefined

647-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.046496 50.863695)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.046397 50.863685,-1.046401 50.863704,-1.046415 50.863722,-1.046437 50.863736,-1.046464 50.863745,-1.046495 50.863748,-1.046526 50.863746,-1.046554 50.863737,-1.046576 50.863723,-1.046590 50.863706,-1.046596 50.863686,-1.046591 50.863667,-1.046577 50.863649,-1.046556 50.863635,-1.046528 50.863626,-1.046497 50.863623,-1.046467 50.863625,-1.046439 50.863634,-1.046416 50.863648,-1.046402 50.863665,-1.046397 50.863685)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL